← Tournament overview

Investigation ranking

Card harshness

Every eligible team ranked from most to least favorable for this statistic. For card harshness, fewer cards than expected is favorable; confidence and sample size are shown so thin-sample teams are marked, never hidden.

Teams 16 of 48
Teams included in every ranking
  1. 1 Norway −68% vs expected limited thin sample 5 matches
  2. 2 Argentina −64% vs expected limited thin sample 5 matches
  3. 3 France −45% vs expected limited thin sample 6 matches
  4. 4 Spain −40% vs expected limited thin sample 6 matches
  5. 5 Switzerland −36% vs expected limited thin sample 5 matches
  6. 6 Belgium −29% vs expected moderate 6 matches
  7. 7 Morocco −24% vs expected moderate 6 matches
  8. 8 Mexico −5% vs expected limited thin sample 5 matches
  9. 9 Colombia +3% vs expected moderate 5 matches
  10. 10 England +27% vs expected moderate 5 matches
  11. 11 Canada +30% vs expected moderate 5 matches
  12. 12 USA +37% vs expected moderate 5 matches
  13. 13 Portugal +59% vs expected moderate 5 matches
  14. 14 Brazil +89% vs expected moderate 5 matches
  15. 15 Paraguay +96% vs expected strong 5 matches
  16. 16 Egypt +113% vs expected strong 5 matches