Finding evidence

Egypt

Compare all teams

Card Harshness

Egypt

Worth notingMirror comparison — same referee, same games

In Egypt's matches the referees booked Egypt more readily than their opponents — a card about every 5 fouls for Egypt, versus about every 9 fouls for the opponents.

Fouls each side committed per card shown in Egypt's matches: Egypt 1 card / 5 fouls; Opponents 1 card / 9 fouls. A longer bar means more fouls before a booking.
Egypt 1 card / 5 fouls
Opponents 1 card / 9 fouls

Longer bar = more fouls allowed before a booking (treated more leniently)

The gap sits mostly on Egypt's own side, not a redistribution between the teams.

This does not show whether comparable fouls were treated differently. We cannot see how bad each foul was, so a harsher rate can simply mean more bookable fouls.

How Card Harshness works
The exact numbers

This does not show whether comparable fouls were treated differently. We cannot see how bad each foul was, so a harsher rate can simply mean more bookable fouls.

Fouls / cards
59 fouls, 12 cards
Expected cards
59 fouls × 0.128 = 7.564
Confidence interval (wilson_binomial)
[0.12, 0.323]
Source matches
  • 1489377
  • 1489396
  • 1489414
  • 1565178
  • 1576804
Per-match inputs
Match Opponent Fouls Cards
1489377 Belgium 15 2
1489396 New Zealand 8 1
1489414 Iran 11 3
1565178 Australia 14 2
1576804 Argentina 11 4
Build snapshot
wc2026-43c8d1939c51
Artifact data